By Ryan McGreal
Published November 19, 2009
According to a City of Hamilton staff analysis obtained by Raise the Hammer, if the city were to end the current practice of charging variable transit levy rates to different communities in the city, it would generate an additional $7.2 million in transit tax revenue.
Currently, residents of the old city pay: nearly three times as much for transit as residents in Glanbrook, three and a half times as much as residents in Stoney Creek, four times as much as residents in Dundas, and nearly five times as much as residents in Ancaster.
For 2009, a median-valued ($219,600) house in the old city paid $195 transit levy. That compares with $62 in Stoney Creek, $83 in Glanbrook, $42 in Ancaster, $46 in Dundas, and $44 in Flamborough.
If the city adjusted rates so that the old city continues to pay the same rate but a median-priced house in any suburban community paid $148 transit levy - still lower than the old city but consistent across the suburban communities - the total transit tax revenue for the city would be $7,201,047 higher than it is currently.
Note - this only applies to homes within the defined urban area. Rural homes would pay nothing toward transit.
|Current Value Assessment||Current Rates||Proposed Change|
|Transit CVA||2009 Transit Taxes||Transit $ (RT=219,600)||Hamilton at $195, all other urban at $148||Transit $ (RT=219,600)|
Table 2, below, breaks down the tax increase in amount and percent by community, for a median-valued home. Again, note that rural residents will see no increase, as they will pay nothing toward transit.
|2009 Final Total Taxes||Transit||$ Change in Transit Tax||% Change in Total Tax|
RTH has learned from sources at City Hall that staff are currently considering a revenue-neutral approach that would involve increasing the rates paid by suburban wards and decreasing the rate paid by the old city so that all residents pay the same rate and the total levy collected does not change.
In other words, the proposal would further deepen the conflict between urban and suburban ratepayers without generating any new money for transit, and it would effectively force the HSR to redistribute its already inadequate resources across an even larger area.
However, Mayor Fred Eisenberger announced yesterday that he plans to call for a randomly selected "Citizens' Jury" to study area rating and provide recommendations to Council and staff.
So far, Councillor Terry Whitehead has stated publicly that he is concerned that such a move might delay a Council decision on area rating past the 2010 municipal election, which would violate the unanimous council vote in 2008 to address area rating before the end of the current mandate.
You must be logged in to comment.