Comment 109353

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted February 19, 2015 at 17:26:32 in reply to Comment 109351

Who paid twice: once to put in the lane, and again to remove it. It would have been much wiser to save the money and keep the lane, which staff said was working well and fulfilling its objectives.

You were arguing that each ward should pay for its own projects, except for shared resources.

Transit is a shared resource, just like police and fire, and this money was provincial and so has nothing to do with wards each paying for their own projects (unless you think the city should never accept provincial money unless it is somehow pro-rated to the provincial tax paid by each ward).

Comment edited by kevlahan on 2015-02-19 17:27:05

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds