Comment 16590

By rake (anonymous) | Posted January 03, 2008 at 22:39:06

that's the best comeback ever, capitalist!

i was just trying to point out how faulty the logic used by capitalist was. if he could put forth a good argument that idling is actually good for hamilton i might change my opinion about the benefit of the bylaw. i welcome such a discussion, by the way.

does anyone dispute that air pollution is a problem in hamilton? does anyone dispute that vehicle emmissions are a cause of a significant amount of that pollution? does anyone dispute that restricting idling of cars is an easy way to reduce the amount of vehicle emmissions? if so, then let's talk.

and as far as getting up off my ass, i know what i did to help this city today and i am satisfied that i am doing my part. i can discuss the validity of a redundant argument posted on this website and help make the city a better place, AND do my laundry! i am just that good.

and as far as me being a jackass, gay smeller, didn't your mother tell you it was rude to call people names. i'll ask her tonight if i drive by her corner down on barton tonight.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds