Comment 26252

By Jihn Dolbec (anonymous) | Posted August 06, 2008 at 12:56:58

All i can say is read the actual policy statement in full, Jason - It speaks for itself.

It all depends on your precsie definition of what are purely "local" streets - certainly we have no problem with say Picton, Macauley; but you would need to go on a specifc street by street basis when you get into the "etc." part - e.g. Bay Street may not be considered by some to be purely "local" in nature; at least as presently utilized.

Again, you really do not to speculate about any Chamber position - they are, for the most part, fully open to public scrutiny at any time "on line".

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools