Comment 31366

By jason (registered) | Posted May 28, 2009 at 14:51:27

a few points come to my mind.

  1. DiIanni's blog is on Ecklund's site and he obviously doesn't like Chapman for sticking it out through the crazy legal process necessary to uncover election scandals. However, I know LD and you can bet that behind the scenes he is telling Chris to calm down and get some tougher skin. DiIanni would never run and go home if someone questioned him. And that's all Chapman did - question Ecklund.

  2. I have no problem at all with Ecklunds waterfall campaign. I wrote this on RTH a few years ago:

And this last year:

Trying to promote Hamilton's natural beauty can hardly be called 'lobbying'. If so, sign me up.

Granted, this news story has uncovered the other 20 some odd 'businesses/websites' run by Mr. Ecklund so perhaps there is more going on than just promoting Hamilton. I really don't know.

All I know is a philanthropist gives for the love of their cause or community, expecting nothing in return. That doesn't seem to be the case here, now.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools