Comment 31376

By JonC (registered) | Posted May 28, 2009 at 21:35:59

That seems like a vast over simplification. In fact it seems inaccurate. I would suggest going back and re-reading the comments on past articles. Most regarding Stinson skeptical at best (mixed with some hope) and in general Ecklund has only received a bad rap on this latest action, which was weak at best. If you care to defend his decision to remove a million dollars in funding from his most favourite thing in the whole world due to questions regarding councilors behaviour (the subcommittee meeting wasn't even about him) feel free, but you've clearly over simplified the comments on the site.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds