Comment 31409

By JonC (registered) | Posted May 29, 2009 at 20:59:00

Hi Councillor Whitehead, Thank you for your clarification, but Mr. Ecklund is being thin-skinned. The chain of events (as I understand them) is that Chapman brings up a transaction that includes him (I agree that there isn't any particular reason to bring up individual names in a sub committee meeting), and the newspaper reported the events of the meeting. His reaction is to pull a planned million dollar donation from the Conservation Authourity. That doesn't make sense. At all.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds