Comment 41918

By J Morse (anonymous) | Posted June 12, 2010 at 17:00:47

The phrasing is important, but the details more so. Your suggested article would suit me far better if "in addition to" was replaced with "instead of". Then it would be closer to a new transportation model, rather than one with some minimal compromises.

The problems we have will expand as long as the same (or similar) solutions are always applied. The regions growth is being supported by methods that have proven to be mistakes. What did Einstein say was the definition of insanity?

More lanes = more cars. We need to question WHY this is 'needed'. What would happen if car use wasn't expected when we grow our communities. Surely people got by before the automobile.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds