Comment 48241

By mrjanitor (registered) | Posted September 26, 2010 at 04:10:22

Mr. Santucci argues that an art centre and theatre should qualify as a legal, non-conforming use. But according to Mr. Fletcher, "it is the position of the City that the legal non-conforming status, once non-industrial uses occupied the space, was lost."

What would have been the costs involved if this work was done up front as mentioned above instead of after the fact. Also, how long would it taken to get the legal non-conforming status? Is legal non-conforming status a cheaper and easier route than a full re-zoning? If anyone has information on numbers and time-lines please share them.

Comment edited by mrjanitor on 2010-09-26 03:13:43

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds