Comment 6493

By rantella (anonymous) | Posted April 25, 2007 at 13:50:28

So here's my question--should the Speculator publish a letter that's factually wrong just because it's a sample of what readers think or because it will 'generate more comments'? I guess I'm asking, What's the standard for publishing stuff? Even though it's a letter and not an article, it should still be accurate in it's facts even if it makes controversial conclusions from them. THAT pisses me off......but I'm not going to rant about it :-))

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds