Comment 70102

By bob lee (anonymous) | Posted September 27, 2011 at 16:54:42

Farr's motion was supposed to be brought on September 13, right? I can't understand why Farr postponed it for the receipt of the staff report. The motion we need, three weeks ago, is for council to affirm their support.

Clark's motion reeks of his own political views. This is the same guy who tried to jump ship soon after being re-elected and ran for the federal cons. What's this about?: "Whereas on September 12, 2007, Premier McGuinty and local Liberal candidates promised Hamilton two LRT lines and said that the Conservatives would cancel the projects". This would be a valid point had the province ever even implied the funding was at stake.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools