Comment 75192

By Robert D (anonymous) | Posted March 12, 2012 at 17:49:33 in reply to Comment 75142

Is there any evidence that it actually is more cost effective to have one super-school?

Also, while I believe the trustees are trying to think 10-20 years ahead, I don't think they're thinking 30-40 years ahead (or further) the board needs to retain properties (if not schools) for future potential use/redevelopment. If they keep selling everything, there won't be anything nearby left to build on.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds